On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:43:40PM +0000, Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > Mon Jan 7 16:02:24 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > * test: Exibit a falling test about rollback. > Indeed the only test about rollback was br0ken by a prior test that > creates a > directory and remove read permissions to it. The rollback test do > some > records that silently fail by lack of permissions, finally the rollback > is > cancelled since the named patch doesn't exist. > This shows that rollback need some care.
Thanks for the patch! I've actually been debating the idea of removing the rollback command. It's poorly implemented, and has been a source of confusion and problems. What do you think? -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
