New submission from Nicolas Pouillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This tests leads to a patch with two consecutive addfile ./f, then one cannot unrecord the patch.
darcs 1 and 2 are affected, in both old-fashioned and hashed formats.
$ ./test6.sh
Finished recording patch 'p1'
Tue Jan 15 14:50:32 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* p1
Shall I amend this patch? [yNvpxq], or ? for help:
hunk ./f 1
-foo
Shall I add this change? (1/?) [ynWsfvpxdaqjkc], or ? for help:
rmfile ./f
Shall I add this change? (2/?) [ynWsfvpxdaqjkc], or ? for help:
Finished amending patch:
Tue Jan 15 14:50:32 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* p1
Tue Jan 15 14:50:32 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* p1
addfile ./f
show the buggy pending
addfile ./f
Tue Jan 15 14:50:32 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* p1
Shall I amend this patch? [yNvpxq], or ? for help:
Finished amending patch:
Tue Jan 15 14:50:32 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* p1
Tue Jan 15 14:50:32 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* p1
{
addfile ./f
addfile ./f
hunk ./f 1
+bar
}
----------
files: test6.sh
messages: 2518
nosy: beschmi, droundy, ertai, kowey, tommy
priority: urgent
status: unread
title: Another issue with amend-record --look-for-adds
__________________________________
Darcs bug tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.darcs.net/issue588>
__________________________________
test6.sh
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
