On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:37:35PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This might be overkill. I just thought it would be amusing if > darcs had a module just for the English language :-) > > Tue Jan 29 16:36:13 GMT 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Add some simple English morphology. > > Tue Jan 29 16:36:19 GMT 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Refactor SelectChanges English. > > Tue Jan 29 16:36:33 GMT 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * [issue558] Singular 'do you want to revert this change?'
Applied. And I just have to say: Eric, you are awsome. However, from a computational linguist (even if you *did* get your PhD in France), I expect more from you than this. For instance, there is some present participle code in Unrecord that could be refactored. And really, NounLike is a bit confusing, surely there must be a term for "pluralizable"? After all, I'd like to be able to safely (with static guarantees of grammatical correctness) define functions such as makeDefinite :: NounLike n => n -> ??? makeDefinite n = ??? makeIndefinite :: NounLike n => n -> ??? -- show (singular $ makeIndefinite $ Noun "apple") == "an apple" -- show (singular $ makeIndefinite $ Noun "plum") == "a plum" -- show (plural $ makeIndefinite $ Noun "plum") == "some apples" What's the good of having a haskell-programming computational linguist on board if we can't get static compile-time guarantees of grammatical correctness? -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
