On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:31:41 -0000 David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this is a reasonable request. We needn't look for > *identical* files, but just for substantially-similar non-boring > files. And we've got functions to compare similar files, so it > shouldn't too hard. It's very often that I accidentally use ordinary > mv to rename a file, then kick myself, and have to mv it back again > and then do a darcs mv. That's great to hear. BTW, you don't actually need to move that back, as you can issue "darcs mv a b" *after* a "mv a b"... I still think it's something [what originally asked] that can maybe be alleviated, but not solved completely (consider directory renames, or a complicated reorg of the sources). ... OTOH, I think this is something git does/tries to do, doesn't it? ciao, lele. -- nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929. __________________________________ Darcs bug tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.darcs.net/issue642> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
