On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:34:57AM -0800, Eric Kow wrote: > Second attempt at sending this. > Note that this appears to pass all tests. You have define HAVE_BYTESTRING > by hand, though.
Applied, thanks! And I plan to write a configure test for this. > Sun Feb 3 23:51:11 GMT 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Start converting FastPackedString into a Data.ByteString wrapper. > > Tue Feb 5 09:06:59 GMT 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Add OldFastPackedString for people without the latest bytestring. > > Data.ByteString was included with GHC 6.6, but it seems the > Data.ByteString.Internal > part of the API was only introduced in a later version. > > Tue Feb 5 09:27:19 GMT 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Restore old FastPackedString version of linesPS and unlinesPS. > They behave slightly differently with respect to newlines. > > Tue Feb 5 09:28:29 GMT 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Restore some original FastPackedString code. > It was hanging on some tests, or running out of stack space. I'm puzzled by this one. Have you been able to figure out which bytestring function was ill-behaving? I'd be interested to know, and I suspect dons would be too. > Tue Feb 5 09:30:00 GMT 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Stricter use of BI.toForeignPtr in FastPackedString. > > I don't know if this actually makes a difference. Indeed, the intention > behind > this patch is to avoid introducing any extra laziness where none was found > before. _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel