On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:46:44AM -0800, Don Stewart wrote: > droundy: > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:42:02PM +0000, Eric Kow wrote: > > > Maybe we can egg on the bytestring people and get them to submit > > > patches taking this further down (for example, they could improve our > > > between newlines and nth newline stuff). > > > > That'd be nice. > > If you can get darcs working with bytestrings, I'm happy to write > bytestring-optimised variants of things you need, to squeeze out more > performance.
Eric's already got darcs working with bytestrings, so you could already take a look. But as I mentioned to Eric, it'd be best first to eliminate use of [PackedString] where we can. That'll affect where our bottlenecks are. -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
