Seen on debian-devel... I wonder if it will ever be possible to achieve a greater unity between Arch and darcs? Perhaps an Arch backend for darcs is possible?
Incidentally, if they solve this, and also the UI issues, this could be a better-darcs-than-darcs since it wouldn't have all the annoying conflict issues. But that may be a big If. ----- Forwarded message from Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- From: Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 17:13:49 +1000 To: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Is Ubuntu a debian derivative or is it a fork? On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 00:06 -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > BTW, the baz folks could get some very neat ideas from darcs. The > "offline mode comes free" way of working is very nice, and the > branching being easier than Arch is nice, too. We have .. we're about 3 releases (~3 months) away from a full pull-style checkout that will bring all the history and be branchable via a simple cp. This is part of our convergence with the bzr design, as bzr proves each point we're bringing it into baz - quite successfully so far. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>. ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
