On 2005-06-03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Aaron Denney wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't this also keep darcs from incorporating GPLed code that
>> didn't have this exception?  Because we can't grant rights for others
>> to mix such code (or derived works) with CPL code.
>
> It would not prevent darcs from incorporating GPLed code that
> didn't have this exception, but the combined package of darcs with
> someotherGPL'edcode would be effectively under the GPL and not under
> the GPL-plus-special-exception-for-CPL.

Well, yes.  The point is that we can't do both.  So which is more
important?

-- 
Aaron Denney
-><-


_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to