On Wednesday 08 June 2005 18:39, Remko Troncon wrote: > Hi, > > We have a small problem with the use of Darcs for our project. We > have a central repository, to which only the developers can push. We > also have quite some contributors, who send patches to the developers > for committing to the main branch. Our problem is that we not only > want to know who created the patch, but that we also want to track > who pushed the patch to the branch. A developer committing it should > have to change the patch to reflect who committed it (or who wrote > the patch), but this would mean that the patch authors would get > conflicts when pulling from the main branch again. > > The only solution we seem to find is to use the unix filesystem > ownership of patches to see who committed the patch. > > Does anyone have any other solutions for this ?
You can use email (darcs send) instead of darcs push to apply the patches to the central repository. That makes it easy to invoke a wrapper who keeps a log of who sent the email. -erik -- Erik Schnetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.aei.mpg.de/~eschnett/ My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from www.keyserver.net.
pgp3bwpnQilUV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
