Quoting Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jamie Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I agree with the rest of what you said though. A patch is considered a
derived work,
Are you sure? Is there legal precedence on this? Are you willing to
bet the cost of a copyright lawsuit?
I find it strange that something I write isn't mine to do what I want
with -- even if it is a modification to something else. (But then I
find a lot of so-called intellectual property strange)
<snip>
The patch is also copyright the patch-writer (unless otherwise stated),
so the patch-writer can relicense it how he/she sees fit, IIRC and
IANAL.
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @
WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
