On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 03:26:50PM +0300, Jani Monoses wrote: > Ah, one other thing: one of the main advantages of a patches-only repo was > that there's no need for darcs installed on the server, at least that's how > I thought of the dumb mirroring script. But if the modification is to darcs > apply I guess we still need darcs on the remote it just won't do as much. > From my original mail : > > " > If this worked there could be a darcs push variant which created such > non-working-dir, repository-only repos without the need for server side > darcs as applying would not be needed. > "
Pushing, pulling and applying patches can change their representation, as a result of commutation. Server-side darcs wouldn't be neccesary only in the most simple situations. Simply copying patches could produce a corrupted repository. Best regards Tomasz _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
