Hi! On Thursday 23 June 2005 04:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think there are two issues under discussion: should pathnames be reported > relative to the root or to the current pruning directory, and should the > current pruning directory default to the root (as in the current "darcs > record") or to the current working directory (as in "darcs record .").
That's what I think too. > I vote +1 on pathnames being reported relative to the current pruning > directory. +1 > So "darcs whatsnew" will show you all files new in the repo, with paths > starting at the repo's root, and "darcs whatsnew ." will show you all files > new in the current subdir, with paths starting at the current subdir. I can live with "darcs whatsnew" operating on the whole repo, because you can always use "darcs whatsnew ." instead. Cheers, Stefan -- Stefan Wehr Web: http://www.stefanwehr.de PGP: Key is available from pgp.mit.edu, ID 0B9F5CE4 _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
