On Wednesday 22 June 2005 20:40, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Wednesday 22 June 2005 10:48, Stefan Wehr wrote: > > I suggest that "darcs whatsnew" should behave like "darcs whatsnew .", > > the same for other relevant commands. Furthermore, filenames should be > > reported relative to the current working directory and not relative to > > the directory containing `_darcs'. > > Actually; I find this feature the best feature of Darcs and using the '.' > for the one or two times I actually want only the current dir makes sense > and makes me not loose any functionality. > > Indeed; the functionality of darcs is logical based on the fact that darcs > is patch based and not tree or file based. > CVS and SVN only work on the current dir because they see each subdir as a > separate repo. SVN also has lots of problems in consistency for > recursiveness being defaut for commans (add v.s revert for example), > another thing I really don't want to copy. > > No, the way darcs choose to do things makes sense and should be kept.
Do you think it make sense that "darcs whatsnew ." displays filenames starting with './' although the filenames are relative to darcs' root directory and not to the current working directory? Cheers, Stefan -- Stefan Wehr (formerly Heimann) Web: http://www.stefanwehr.de PGP: Key is available from pgp.mit.edu, ID 0B9F5CE4 _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
