On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 08:32:56AM -0700, Mark Lentczner wrote: > >I'd rather people didn't make assumptions about darcs' behavior, and > >instead relied on existing unix safeguards (such as permissions) to > >enforce policy. > > Agreed. However, due to the design of unix, it is hard to enforce a > policy as narrow as "can only run darcs in this sub tree". Unix > safeguards are based on accounts, and accounts are rather corse in what > they can and cannot do. And - as is often the case - I don't want to > give accounts for each developer.
You really only need one account per repository, and many developers can be granted access via their ssh keys. In some cases this may be worse than one per developer, but often one has only one repository but many developers. -- David Roundy http://www.darcs.net _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
