On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:45:11 +0200 Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Yes, that's exactly what I meant. If a file's time is not > up-to-date, Darcs will need to do a bytewise comparison of the > file's contents.
Ah, that explains it - I was interpreting your suggestion as implying my pristine tree didn't match the patch history, not the working copy. This makes much more sense to me. > We need to update the pristine cache with hash information, so that > Darcs can get away with just reading one file rather than two. But > implementing this is left pending until the darcs-git merge (soon, I > promise!). Thanks, it's apparent that I've just hit a scaling issue. Not a huge surprise with 9.9MB under darcs' control (a 21MB repositor). I'm looking forward to the merge, currently darcs-git doesn't build out of the repository for me but I suspect that activity is high enough that waiting is better. -- Jonathan Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
