On Mon, 2005-18-07 at 09:39 -0400, David Roundy wrote: > Yeah, I think that hashes of the patch ID can serve as sufficiently useful > unique patch IDs. The patch ID (author+date+name+log) is already required > to be unique--although darcs doesn't do anything special to enforce this, > darcs fails if it's not true, so we've already got a unique patch > identifier.
Could the email generated by `darcs --send` use those hashes, say one line per patch, instead of the masses and masses of text from the record comments for every patch in the dependency tree that tag along right now? AfC Sydney -- Andrew Frederick Cowie Technology strategy, managing change, establishing procedures, and executing successful upgrades to mission critical business infrastructure. http://www.operationaldynamics.com/ Sydney New York Toronto London _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
