David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:05:09AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: >> David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > That would be pretty easy, but also not terribly informative. A more >> > "correct" date would be chosen according to when that particular file was >> > actually modified. But that would also be an expensive date to >> > determine. >> >> That is unreliable - you'd only use the time of the "record" operation. > > That's the only time that we have.
"record" time is reasonable, it sounded like you'd wish to track file times or such, which is not a "good time" to use if I need to split two changes I made to record them separately (although I must say that darcs's interactive record operation makes it easy to avoid such operations that are needed on SCMs that operate only with file granularity). -- Matthias Andree _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
