On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 03:50:22PM -0400, Michael Price wrote: > On 8/21/05, Erik Schnetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think one should dismiss an idea from a darcs user like that. > > First of all, I'm not dismissing the idea, just giving my equally > valid view that adding it as a command to darcs isn't necessary. And > I'm not alone in that belief. > > In fact, I belief in that so much that I'd be happy to write the > relevant wrapper script and donate it to be included with darcs.
OK, great. > > It may be that the people who don't like the idea don't have the > > problem of knowing whether a repository still contains data that don't > > exist anywhere else, but this question is quite interesting in general > > when you have potentially many distributed repositories. Whether this > > is implemented in darcs, or via a wrapper script, or implicitly through > > "good workflow" does not matter. The problem should somehow be > > discussed in a darcs introduction. > > That's a good idea too. > > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > darcs-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users > -- http://ofb.net/~frederik/ _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
