On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 06:29:16PM -0700, Frederik Eaton wrote: > Well, should I send a patch to change the default or what? David? > Nobody seems to disagree.
A change of default wouldn't really bother me, but first you'd need to fix it so --set-scripts-executable works again. > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:36:53AM +0000, Mark Stosberg wrote: > > On 2005-08-20, Frederik Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> ... > > >> a) `darcs --set-scripts-executable` is an option that must be supplied > > >> to Darcs when you *do* a get. You can cause this to be the default > > >> behaviour of Darcs for you if you add > > >> > > >> get --set-scripts-executable > > >> > > >> to ~/.darcs/defaults [why this isn't just the default behaviour of Darcs > > >> is beyond me - setting something executable is a lot different than > > >> *running* it, sigh] > > > > > > Well, I propose that we change the default to make scripts executable! > > > > I would like this as well. My team just got bitten by the disappearing > > executable bit this week when a new CGI script was added to the repo. > > It needed to repaired in seven copies of the repo. -- David Roundy http://www.darcs.net _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
