> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:24:45AM +0200, Thomas Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wa=
> s heard to say:
>> On Monday 24 October 2005 22:38, Mark Stosberg wrote:
>> > I'm interested to see if other users would like
>> >
>> > darcs record --summary
>> >
>> > This would show you the same output as "darcs whatsnews --summary",
>> > and then give a prompt to record.
>> >
>> > =A0From there the user can step through them in detail as usual, or
>> > record them all at once.
>> >
>> > This is a middle ground between "--interactive" and "--all" and is
>> > sometimes all I need to know.
>>=20
>> I find the 'f' button to OK all changes in a File to do that just as easy=
>=20
>> and it does not force me to decide if I want to do files or patches based=
>=20
>> ok-ing beforehand. (more features make usage harder for new users, you=20
>> know that, right?)
>
> I had the impression he meant just printing "whatsnew -s" output and
> then running record as usual.
That's right.
Thomas concern has some merit, though. However, the commands push, pull
and send already have this flag, so it hardly to more to learn. If you
seen what --summary does in any of those cases, it will be very familiar
in 'record'.
The output of "darcs subcommand -h" could be improved to highlight the
unique options versus the common options.
> Patch attached.
Great. Could you resend with 'darcs send' ? I wasn't able to apply the
patch from the inlined copy.
Mark
--
http://mark.stosberg.com/
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
