>>>>> "Juliusz" == Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juliusz> Running without _darcs/current is already implemented
Juliusz> (darcs init --no-pristine-tree), but you forget the
Juliusz> working dir. There's currently no way to avoid having a
Juliusz> working dir in a darcs repo; I believe there should be
Juliusz> one.
Yeech. OK, you got me.
I don't see a theoretical reason why we couldn't do without both
current and working directories. We'd need to change the patch format
so that a patch would know its source and target trees (git implements
this, I believe, or at least it could easily do so), and then have
public "patch warehouses" rather than repositories.
I suspect that this would be rather fragile at first, so it's probably
not worth doing at this point, but it's too elegant to say nothing. :-)
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
