Hi!
I just wanted to let you know that I've tagged darcsweb 0.12. You can get
it with "darcs get http://auriga.wearlab.de/~alb/repos/darcsweb".
It includes several changes and fixes since the last tag; the most
important are:
* Shade and zebra style for annotate.
* Use real tree if there's no pristine directory.
* Include the list of changed files in the RSS description.
* More verbose annotate sidebar (thanks to Max Battcher).
* Implement "multidir" configuration entries for automatic configuration
where there are several repositories in a single directory.
Fixes include some HTML and XML generation (thanks to Alexandre Rossi) and
showing empty repos (thanks to Michal Sojka).
I'm thinking about adding a list on the darcsweb's site
(http://users.auriga.wearlab.de/~alb/darcsweb/) to places that use it, so
people can see what it looks like; so if you do and don't mind appearing
on the list drop me an email or something =)
As usual, please let me know if you have any question or suggestions about
it.
I also have a couple of questions: first of all, I've been wondering if
anyone thinks a "heavy-duty darcsweb" is needed for sites with high
traffic and/or several repos (like kernel.org or something like that). I
don't know if there are any of those, where the darcsweb overhead of
calling darcs for every visit is too much.
The second question is about configuration: let's imagine that you have 20
repositories in a single directory, so you use a multidir entry in
darcsweb to avoid configuring all by hand, but you would also like to have
a different description for each one: would it be
clean/nice/polite/appropiate to put it under _darcs/prefs/description, or
maybe create _darcs/darcsweb/description? Or is it better to do it in a
different way?
What is the recommended policy regarding the use of the _darcs directory
for "third-party" applications like darcsweb?
Thanks,
Alberto
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users