On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 07:17:23AM -0500, David Roundy wrote: > > I thought about creating a simple darcs-server. It would be an > > additional (perhaps hidden) darcs command, that would make darcs > > respond to requests on stdin/stdout. One kind of request would > > be to get a list of files, the other would be to invoke a darcs > > command. > > One major downside of this approach is that it requires darcs on the > other side.
If there was no darcs on the other side, we could fall back to normal darcs-less operation. I think it could be done without making a mess of it. > It'd be nice to not require darcs for ssh pull, send and get. Sure, but on the other hand why not use darcs on the other side if it is available? > > The other approach, which could remove this problem, is to write a shell > > script that would be sent to the other side of ssh connection and > > executed there. This is an idea taken from shfs. > > This is scary in terms of portability--keep in mind that it may be Windows > on the other side of the ssh connection. Good point. Best regards Tomasz _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
