Am Samstag, 19. November 2005 15:22 schrieb Lele Gaifax: > >>>>> "Wolfgang" == Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Wolfgang> As far as I know, darcs has repository-independent > Wolfgang> identifiers for patches, so it would be better to use > Wolfgang> these in links to changesets. > > Yes but... > > Wolfgang> Is there any effort in changing Trac on darcs to use > Wolfgang> darcs' patch identifiers instead of the > Wolfgang> Subversion-inspired numeric identifiers which are > Wolfgang> repository-dependant? > > ... are you really going to resort to cut&paste to refer to a > changeset? Wouldn't wiki pages and tickets look very ugly with all > those long hashes?
Yes, they would. :-( But what if I just want to refer to a changeset independently of a repository? Say, I have a development repository and a repository for bugfixes of the 1.0 version of my software. Now I fix a bug in the 1.0 version. I apply a patch to the 1.0 repository and apply this patch also to the development repository. It's just this patch that fixed the bug, not this patch as part of some repository. I would like to be able to have a tracker comment which just says: "Fixed by [<identifier of the patch>].". > Some time ago David Roundy mentioned an idea of having a double > identifier for a patch, one global (the actual hash) and a local one, > an svn-like increasing integer. I'd really prefer having both ways of > referencing a changeset, say [20051026153119-7a6fb-97a....f1cc.gz] > *and* [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe, if at all possible, the former should > should be rendered as the latter. This might be a solution. > ciao, lele. Best wishes, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
