> >> I see no reason you can't put a patch in a blob.
> Juliusz> Interesting suggestion. What does it buy you?
> A standard exchange format.
I'm sorry, Stephen, but I'm afraid you lost me.
I read this as implying that just dumping native Darcs patches into a
Git repository somehow makes Git-aware tool grok Darcs patches. Which
is probably not what you meant.
> (1) you get pristines and/or revision libraries in a format that is
> not subject to corruption by typical recursive operations by
> developers,
Recursive tools that descend into _darcs, but somehow avoid .git?
> and (2) you get to leverage UIs and schemas that address Git
> content.
And these UIs will not need to be modified to grok _darcs patches?
Juliusz
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
