[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
The patch id isn't a hash of the patch, but a hash of the patch metadata. As far as I know, this gains none of the benefits of hash-based identification but suffers all of the costs and then some. Darcs probably would have done better to choose a random 20-byte string to be the patch id.
Why? A random id would make almost impossible using tailor :) ciao, lele. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
