On 3/3/06, Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:48:43PM -0500, Zachary P. Landau wrote: > > Thu Mar 2 20:45:34 EST 2006 Zachary P. Landau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Make darcs exit after last patch in changes --interactive. > > Currently, hitting 'j' on the last patch in changes --interactive has > > no effect. This patch will cause darcs to exit, making the command > > more consistent with an interactive pull. > > I know there are different opinions about this, but I would > rather all darcs commands _not_ exit/commence after the last > answer. I think of the dialogue as a form to fill in and then > either Ok or Cancel (with d/q). I often want to check what > patches got selected after the last answer, before I continue. > Unpull/Obliterate/Unrecord already requires 'd' (or 'q') to > finish the dialogue (unless you want to remove the very last > patch). Hitting j/y/n on the last patch could print "No more > patches. Press d to commit or q to cancel.". > > This is of course just my personal wish. I'm switching to > darcs-users to see if anyone wants to support or oppose this > idea.
I don't have an overly strong opinion about it, but if anything, I lean towards your direction. In the case of changes --interactive, it's not that important because no action is taken. But in the case where the repository is changed, it wouldn't hurt to explicitly say you are ready. -- Zachary P. Landau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
