On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 01:13:44PM -0500, Brian Smith wrote: > On 9/11/06, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 05:29:30PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > >> > It looks like the patch that is needed does not have a name, so I > >can't pull > >> > it with "darcs pull -p." > >> > >> ``darcs changes --xml'' will give you the patch's hash. Then do > >> > >> darcs pull --match='hash ...' > > > >Also, it does have a name, which is 04.07.06. You can pull with > > > >darcs pull --tag='04\.07\.06' > > > I tried both of these techniques but I gave up after letting each one run > for 20 minutes or so. (This is using darcs 1.0.8 on Windows for repository > http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc). > > Do the above techniques do significantly less work than darcs get --complete > would do?
Get is more efficient than pull, for what it does. Which is more efficient for your particular problem will depend on what you're doing, and I don't remember what you were doing... -- David Roundy _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
