On 9/13/06, Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:24:04PM +1000, Hoan Ton-That wrote:

What I'm a bit worried about with your new proposed ignore command is that it (to me) doesn't look like much value for the money (or rather, feature for the extra complexity). And it doesn't solve the "real" problem either, does it? What if I want to put a local #ifdef / #endif in a file while making changes to it, and don't want to be pestered with questions about them on
every new record of real changes to that file?

FWIW, I 100% support this position. There should be some support for a "local changes" repository that always gets merged with the default repository. I think that feature is very useful and will take care of most practical cases where the proposed feature is helpful.

Regards,
Brian
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to