Max Battcher wrote:
On 9/14/06, Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will not use this functionality myself, I think tand hat the
submitter is using the wrong tool for the job (he wants to use
Unison).
I disagree.
I agree with you on this point (even if I understood Juliusz statement
in another way, not suggesting the use of Unison...), since it happened
to me a few times, of inadvertitely record a local modification (not the
password kind, but rather debug statements). Anyway, in these cases, I'd
prefer the local changesets approach (it would be enough being able to
specify a particular exclude-patch/exclude-match option to pull/push):
that's a more powerfull way of achieving the same goal.
But I tend to agree with him on the other points he raised:
* no need to introduce two new commands (suggested options ala find
would be enough): it would call another pair to "edit" the boring
file, and then maybe some other to edit defaultrepo, repos and so
on.
* high chance of missing something, so that I'd like to be alerted
when darcs ignores something (much like it warns be about omitting
boring entries)
* an option like exclude-path would be better than a "ignored-files"
thanks&bye,
lele.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
