On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:32:29PM -0400, Nathan Gray wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 03:19:15PM -0400, Ralph Dratman wrote: > > (Another possibility occurs to me: If I decline to record a change, I > > guess I could manually revert that change in my sources. Is that the > > recommended procedure?) > > I do that sometimes to remove debugging lines, or "fixes" that did not > work.
Yeah, but it's usually easier to use darcs revert to revert changes in your source tree later. It's roughly equivalent to manually editing the files, but saves a record of the change so you can unrevert if you change your mind (but keep in mind, it doesn't keep a history of reverts, so you don't want to rely on this long, or you'll forget and revert something else). David (relishing having the lists working again) _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
