On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:58:23PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > For it to work in a "reasonable" way, Darcs needs to "know" about > ChangeLogs, in the same way that it needs to "know" about token > replacement. > > There's nothing wrong with that, IMO, but AIUI David doesn't want more > such special cases.
Actually, I don't object to new patch types. Eventually I'd like to have a whole slew of them... but they'd definitely have to be non-buggy, and we'd have to be careful in the interface for generating them. Something like binaries would work, but am unsure whether that's the best approach. -- David Roundy Dept. of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
