On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 10:41:10AM -0600, Brian Smith wrote: > I have also experienced cases where darcs seems to generate patches with > too many "false" changes. > > Imagine that I was holding a repository in Darcs and Subversion at the same > time. Then, I think it is reasonable to say that, if the patches Darcs > generates are more noisy than the ones CVS and Subversion generates, then > that should be considered a bug in Darcs. I have never had any notable > problems with the way that Subversion's diff works, which is why I think it > is a good benchmark. This is analogous to the GHC performance metric (If GHC > is not faster than everything else, then a bug should be filed).
What do you mean by noisy? Or "false" changes? I have no idea what you are talking about (which would make it hard to fix). -- David Roundy Dept. of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
