On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 07:55:48PM +0200, Eric Y. Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 45 lines which said:
> Well, for each patch it unpulls, trackdown -v outputs 'Trying > without the patch:' and then a patch name. That's not what I see: % darcs trackdown -v 'grep -i atom Site.tmpl' Tracking down command: grep -i atom Site.tmpl <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="Atom syndication feed - summaries" href="feed.atom" /> <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="Atom syndication feed - full content" href="feed-full.atom" /> Success! % darcs --version 1.0.9rc1 (release candidate 1) > I might be confusing myself here, but wouldn't you want grep -I -i? It yields the same result. > Also you might be interested in darcs changes, which is typically > where I go to find out about this stuff (assuming I write the > appropriate patch comments). If I have proper comments, I can use 'cvs log' or 'svn log' or 'darcs changes'. My concern was for the cases where the comment is insufficient (a very common case). _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
