How about Unison and a usb drive.
On 5/13/07, Nimrod A. Abing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/12/07, Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Justin Bailey wrote: > > I have a situation which is described perfectly in an email from 2005 > > (http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2005-March/006425.html). > > IIUC, the two sites cannot be reached directly from each other (so http > or ssh access is out of the question. Would it be possible to have a > setup with two repos at each site, one local working repo, and one > mirror of the remote. Ideally, you'd have a procmail setup that applied > patches automatically (examples on the darcs site, I think), and a > mirror setup with 'darcs send' target addresses that are distributed to > both sites. > > Given sites A and B and _w for working, _m for mirror, the patch flow > would look like > > darcs pull A_m -> A_w > (work and record in A_w) > darcs send A_w -> B_m, A_m > > darcs pull B_m -> B_w > (work and record in B_w) > darcs send B_w -> A_m, B_m > > You'd need to be careful never to 'pull' from or 'push' into the > mirrors, of course. Would something like this work? I have changed my workflow from the one I previously described in the email cited by the OP. I now follow that same idea suggested by Ketil above as it allows for better two-way synchronization between machines. -- _nimrod_a_abing_ [?] http://abing.gotdns.com _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
