On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:28:22AM -0400, Terry Smith wrote:
> >probably this is known to every old darcs user: if you push a patch  
> >to a
> >remote repo which is accessible by others, then it's really bad to
> >unrecord/unpull that patch
> >
> >though newbies (to darcs) regularly do so and afaik there is no way to
> >prevent this
> >
> >so the questions are:
> >
> >1) is there any way to do so?
> >2) if not, should i sent a feature request about having a --no-remote
> >(or something like that) option for unrecord/unpull?
> 
> You can edit _darcs/prefs/defaults on the remote repo to disable  
> certain commands.
> 
> For example, the following disables the unpull and unrecord commands.
> 
> >$ cat _darcs/prefs/defaults
> >unpull disable
> >unrecord disable

I think there was a wish-list item in the old bug tracker (RT) a
long time ago, for options to the Initialize command (and Get
and Put) to automatically set up the new repo with suitable
defaults, such as some commands disabled. Something like
--master-repo (with most commands disabled and not allowing any
conflicts), --normal-repo (a default, with dangerous "expert"
commands disabled) and --working-repo (with everything enabled).
The names of the options are just suggestions.


-- 
Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to