On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:40:49PM +0200, Alexander Staubo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > We have gradually realized that the probability of hitting this > problem grows proportionally to the age of any branch. This is a > considerable and costly problem for us -- developer time is simply too > expensive to be wasted on fighting the version control system.
You might want to look into other version control systems that don't try to be as clever as darcs. I found it to be fairly easy to convert my darcs repositories to Mercurial with only a little flailing around; I've heard good things about git too. Compared to fighting your tool or paying thousands of dollars for someone to fix it, it might be a good alternative. I know how attached we coders get to our tools, and in all other ways darcs is a pretty awesome one, but sometimes you have to accept that the negatives outweigh the positives and let go of it. (just MHO, take it for what it's worth) Daniel _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
