On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 10:57 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > > dir1/file1 (belongs to package 1) > > > dir1/file2 (belongs to package 1) > > > dir1/file3 (belongs to package 2) > > > dir2/file1 (belongs to package 1) > > > dir2/file2 (belongs to package 2) > > > > With darcs, I would set up two repositories (package1 and package2). > > I would then set up a combined repository: > > > > darcs get package1 combined > > cd combined > > darcs pull ../package2 > > > > I would then continue to make edits to 'package1' and 'package2', and keep > > 'combined' up-to-date by pulling from both source repositories.
> This is what we have planned (and did with "svn copy" and "svn > merge"), but it's OK when there are two packages, and comes to a NP > problem when there are 10 packages present (i.e.: I cannot afford to > provide all possible combinations of ten packages). I don't understand why you would need to? AFAIU, for n packages, you'd need n+1 repositories, surely that would be manageable? -k _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
