On 10/16/07, Hilary Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have used darcs at my workplace for a couple of years now, and it has > proved to be an extremely useful tool. In my opinion darcs was the > first system to make revision control so easy that only an idiot > wouldn't do it (and I could never return to a centralized system). We > have, however, run into the infamous "exponential time" merge problem > twice, and when that happens it is effectively an insurmountable barrier > to most users.
You're not alone -- it has been driving us nuts and costing us real money. Here's a thread I started a couple of months ago: http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2007-August/011210.html Darcs has many good things going for it; development momentum is not one of them, I am afraid. (If you're curious, nobody took up the bounty offer.) Alexander. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
