"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sure, they should be warned. I agree there are some technical > showstoppers for certain classes of potential users, generally a > smallish fraction of users. Evidently your use cases suffer from > several of them.
No, unfortunately, it's not a small fraction. I've hit this problem on several projects, and because I'm honest about my past experiences I've been pretty much unable to convince any project I work on to use darcs. Perhaps what you mean is that a small fraction of darcs operations trigger this behavior. That may be true, but most users will encounter the behavior at least once, which is too often. - a -- PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770 B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380 _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
