On 2007-10-21, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:46:34AM -0700, > Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 33 lines which said: > >> with git or mercurial, even a "passive" developer who pulls these >> two patches will need to add an additional content-free patch to >> merge them. > > I regard this as a huge practical problem and this is the main reason > why I hate Mercurial.
It's not content-free if you must commit a merge patch, but anyway: it's a big reason I like Mercurial. I have a log of who merged something in, and when, which I don't get in Darcs. -- John _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
