Ben Franksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> *darcs should allow to record changes to the content of a file that has been
> removed (or wasn't even added in the first place)*
  [...]
> What do you think?

I'm no darcs expert, so perhaps that is why I am confused.

What would it mean to pull a change to a file that doesn't exist?
What does my repo look like afterwards?  If I then pull a patch that
creates the file, what will change?

Don't know if this is related, but I think it was once proposed that
new files would be created ..uh..somewhere else, with a unique name,
and 'darcs mv'ed into place.  This would let you have different files
with the same name at different times.

-k
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to