Nicolas Pouillard writes: > That's a case where having some kind disjunctive tag point in > history could be good (what's hell is that thing...).
This is just the --partial repo problem in another guise. In both cases, yes, you could solve it with a "disjunctive tag point." But the implementation will be very hairy, I expect, because you'll need to walk up the "future" history and fix all the dependencies, because they are part of the "identity" of each patch. This gives the "git-rebase" problem, I'm afraid: it will be very difficult to share such repos, except by copying them in full. But that's what --partial is trying to avoid. So you'll need to label all those patches with a place to get any missing dependencies. What if that place disappears? And we're back where we started. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
