On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 02:04:19PM -0600, zooko wrote: > On Apr 23, 2008, at 2:29 AM, Eric Kow wrote: > > > > I'm more against than for. Maybe one way to get the same effect is to > > use the darcs-devel list for tracker messages, patches and the such > > (messages like 'pushed, thanks!). Any discussions should be held on > > darcs-users. For example, if a patch sparks a discussion, it should > > be held or cc'd on darcs-users. > > One way to do this would be to have a mailing list that automated > messages get sent to, including issue tracker messages, and the > "Reply-To" on that list is set to the darcs discussion list. So > humans never post to the automated list, but humans can subscribe to > that list if they want to receive such traffic, and if they reply > then the discussion moves onto the human discussion list.
This sounds like a good solution to me. Two lists, one with generated messages, one with human discussion. -kolibrie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
