Tommy Pettersson wrote: > implementation. The second problem, as you would possibly notice > long into the future when it's much too late, is that every new > patch you record will depend on this whole initialization patch, > so you can not pull out small parts of the source tree, should
Gosh, I never understood this, but it makes sense. Thanks! Then, should darcs split up the initial patch by file automatically, to preserve maximum flexibility and efficiency ? And if so, why should it not do this for every patch ? I think there must be some difference between the initial case and later patches which explains why we wouldn't want to do this every time. I guess it is that we want normal patches to stay atomic to communicate their meaning, but for the initial patch we don't care. -Simon _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
