Jason Dagit wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> I've switched to using darcs2 locally (no repo changes yet, just to see
> how well it works as a drop-in replacement). It seems to be noticeably
> slower for many of the operations I do day to day.
>
> You listed whatsnew and amend-record. Do any others come to mind?
Yes, now that you mention it, add and remove are very slow. In that
same testsuite repository:
$ time darcs2 add ghc-e006.hs
8.10s real 7.22s user 0.56s system 96% darcs add ghc-e006.hs
$ time darcs2 remove ghc-e006.hs
16.00s real 14.54s user 0.96s system 96% darcs remove ghc-e006.hs
and darcs-1:
$ time /usr/bin/darcs add ghc-e006.hs
0.03s real 0.01s user 0.01s system 93% /usr/bin/darcs add ghc-e006.hs
$ time /usr/bin/darcs remove ghc-e006.hs
0.37s real 0.16s user 0.07s system 62% /usr/bin/darcs remove
ghc-e006.hs
> Have
> you enabled the global cache mechanism? Have you experimented with the
> repository format upgrades? So many questions, so little time :)
Not in production yet, no. I'm still using my old darcs-1 repositories
for now so that I can still use darcs-1 if anything goes wrong.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
