Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 30.04.2008, 22:02 -0700 schrieb Jason Dagit:
> I'm not a fan of hardcoded values and I realized we have "_darcs"
> appearing all over in the source base.  So in the spirit of relaxing
> mindless programming tasks I've refactored it all to Darcs.Global (not
> sure that's the right place, but the other ones I tried created module
> import cycles).
> 
> Enjoy,
> Jason
> 
> Wed Apr 30 21:26:50 PDT 2008  Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   * refactor "_darcs" to darcsdir variable

Just wondering: I’m sure this has been discussed before, but is there a
good reason for allowing ".darcs" as well, at least optionally for local
repositories (that people don’t pull from over a slow link)? Or maybe
darcs could look in "_darcs" first and then in ".darcs"?

Greetings,
Joachim
-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
  mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Key: 4743206C
  JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  Debian Developer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to