> How did this discussion end up? Are the Haskell temp file/temp > directory abstractions good enough for darcs?
Most of my patches were accepted; and one was replaced by a better version from David > Does darcs now create temp files in the system-appropriate temp > directory where they belong? Not very much has changed, although the code has been simplified to use more standard libraries. In other words, temporary files which are used by darcs itself will still be created in the current directory, and not a designated temp. On the other hand, in places where darcs pays attention to DARCS_TMPDIR, it will now respect Windows conventions (i.e. TEMP instead of TMPDIR), where appropriate. Also, the bug which made it impossible to do darcs --help in a write-protected directory has been fixed. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
