2008/5/16 David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Thu May 15 18:09:32 EEST 2008 Pekka Pessi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Zapped bash-ism from configure.ac. > > What do you think of just switching to bash for configure? This particular > change seems unproblematic, but requiring bash to compile darcs doesn't > seem *too* onerous, and might make it easier to ensure a portable configure > script.
Build already depends on perl and other non-standard goodies. In that sense, requiring bash is not a big deal, especially if it makes it easier to run test scripts. Problem with bash is that its path is not standard like /bin/sh, even if its installed, it might be found from /usr/local/bin or somewhere else. -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
