On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 03:24:21PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hmm... David isn't too happy with the Eclipse part. > > I personally don't care either way, so it may be up to Zooko to > open this debate. > > Anyway, let's finish collecting these and see. I'm going on the idea here > that > if people grant all three, then they implicitly grant a just-openssl > exception.
On further reading, I actually don't mind the eclipse-license bit. For some reason I was thinking we were dual-licensing darcs, which would reduce its copyleftness, but since we're only allowing linking with code that is actually under the eclipse license, that's okay. I don't know why anyone would want to link darcs with code under the eclipse license, but I don't suppose that's my business. David _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
